Background of the Study:
Indigenous dispute resolution mechanisms in Ezza South Local Government have been an integral part of community governance for generations. These mechanisms rely on traditional norms, mediation by elders, and customary practices to resolve conflicts amicably (Ikechukwu, 2023). Such systems are characterized by their emphasis on restorative justice and communal harmony, offering alternative approaches to the often adversarial modern legal systems (Uche, 2024). Despite their effectiveness in maintaining social cohesion, these indigenous mechanisms are increasingly challenged by modern legal frameworks and urban influences that undermine traditional practices (Chukwu, 2025). This study evaluates the structure, efficacy, and relevance of indigenous dispute resolution in contemporary settings. By integrating ethnographic research with legal analysis, the investigation aims to provide insights into how traditional conflict management practices can be adapted to complement formal judicial processes, thereby preserving community values while ensuring justice (Ikechukwu, 2023).
Statement of the Problem:
The erosion of indigenous dispute resolution mechanisms in Ezza South due to modern legal influences has led to reduced community participation and a loss of culturally rooted conflict resolution practices. This creates challenges in maintaining social harmony and effective justice at the local level (Uche, 2024).
Objectives of the Study:
To document indigenous dispute resolution mechanisms.
To assess their effectiveness compared to modern legal systems.
To suggest ways to integrate traditional and modern dispute resolution methods.
Research Questions:
What are the key indigenous dispute resolution practices in Ezza South?
How effective are these practices in resolving conflicts?
What strategies can facilitate the integration of indigenous and modern systems?
Research Hypotheses:
Indigenous dispute resolution mechanisms are effective in fostering community harmony.
Modern legal systems inadequately address local conflict resolution needs.
Integrative approaches can enhance overall justice outcomes.
Significance of the Study:
This study provides critical insights into alternative dispute resolution methods that honor indigenous practices. It is valuable for policymakers and community leaders seeking to improve conflict management by blending traditional wisdom with formal legal processes (Chukwu, 2025).
Scope and Limitations of the Study:
Limited to the evaluation of indigenous dispute resolution mechanisms in Ezza South Local Government, Ebonyi State.
Definitions of Terms:
Dispute Resolution: Methods used to resolve conflicts.
Indigenous Mechanisms: Traditional systems and practices rooted in local culture.
Restorative Justice: A process that emphasizes repairing harm through inclusive processes.
Local governments play a crucial role in the provision and maintenance of san...
ABSTRACT
The research was on privatization or public enterpr...
ABSTRACT
Although inspection has always been integral to every organization in Nigeria, it has either been ignored or r...
Background of the Study
Women’s empowerment is widely recognized as a crucial driver for improved m...
Background of the Study
Nigeria’s oil sector has long been the backbone of its economy, contributing significantly to...
Background of the Study
Financial market liberalization—characterized by the removal of government-imposed restricti...
Background of the study
Yoruba folklore, with its rich oral traditions, serves as a repository of cultural values and histo...
Background of the Study
The COVID-19 pandemic caused unprecedented disruptions to global healthcare systems, affecting health-seeking beh...
Background of the Study
Open banking represents a paradigm shift in the financial services industry, enabling secure data s...
Background of the study
According to Hot Mass Communication Topic (2023), newspapers, periodicals, radi...